Posts tagged evolution

Top: Uterine lining at 5 1/2 months, displaying thin maternal separation from fetus, and high level of placental implantation
Center: Relation of placenta to uterus at 5 weeks and 8.5 months
Bottom: Major arteries and veins of the placenta

Did you know that the placenta is a temporary organ that’s actually created by the fetus, and not the woman?

The human female is a curious creature; like our close great ape cousins, but unlike almost all other mammals, they build up a thick barrier in the uterine wall, to protect against any potential embryo that might implant itself. When there’s no embryo implantation, the thickened wall is shed, in the process known as menstruation.

The thing is, most mammals don’t menstruate. They go into heat, and occasionally shed uterine lining (if the uterus is scratched, or an egg tries to implant but fails, for example), but there’s no regular cycle of bloody discharge relating to breeding. This is because other mammals go through triggered decidualization (developing a uterine lining only when a fertilized egg begins to implant itself), while the great apes (and a couple other convergently evolved families, including bats) experience spontaneous decidualization, where they develop a thick uterine lining during every ovulation, before an egg can even attempt to implant itself.

Why the different linings? Well, it turns out that there are three types of mammal placentas (remember, placentas are developed by the embryo/fetus, not the mother):

  1. Epitheliochordal, which is completely superficial, and does not connect in any significant way to the mother’s body. The endometrial epithelium, connective tissue, and uterine epithelium are all preserved and undisturbed in the mother. The fetus is separated from the mother by three layers of tissue. Nutrients and waste are delivered and eliminated through diffusion, rather than direct connection. This group includes equids, swine, and ruminants.
  2. Endotheliochordal, which is slightly more invasive to the mother, only preserves the uterine epithelium. Nutrients and waste are not exchanged through direct connection to the mother, but the placenta only leaves one layer of tissue between it and the mother. This group includes cats and dogs.
  3. Hemochorial is the most invasive form of placenta in the animal kingdom. The embryo directly hooks itself up to the host (mother’s) blood flow, and leaves no tissue layers between the female and the placenta. This allows much more efficient nutrient transfer to the embryo or fetus, but is also potentially the most harmful to the female since the embryo attaches itself so securely to the uterine wall. The female must develop preemptive measures (a thickened uterine lining) to protect herself from a life-form that is literally driven to take all of the nutrients it needs to develop, and which has adapted to connect itself directly to the host. This group includes elephant shrews, most bats, and most primates.

Interested in more about the science behind reproduction and how amazingly efficient the human embryo is at sucking its host clean, just to obtain its needed resources for development?

PZ Meyers at Pharyngula has an understandable explanation of the article I referenced for this post.

There is also a great site by R. Bowen about the pathophysiology of the reproductive system.

An American Text-Book of Obstetrics for Practitioners and Students. Edited by Richard C. Norris, 1895.

Top: Bichir and trunkfish [top], Electric Catfish [bottom]
Center: Electric “eel” - Electrophorus electricus
Bottom: Indo-Pacific Moray Eel - Muraena nudivomer (now Gymnothorax nudivomer

A while ago I saw this Bird and Moon illustration of animals with misleading names, but I kept seeing people asking, “Ok, if they’re not THAT, then what ARE they?” For some reason, I completely forgot that I wanted to cover those questions, but hey, better late than never!

The electric eel isn’t an eel - it’s a knifefish. Knifefish (Gymnotiformes) are actually more closely related to electric catfish (Siluriformes) than they are to true eels (order Anguilliformes), but developed their electroconductive organs through convergent evolution - the first signs of the organ evolution in both the electric eel and the electric catfish appeared after they shared a common ancestor.

In addition to electric eels and electric catfish, electric rays (order Torpediniformes) are the only other “strongly electric” fishes - that is, fish that produce electric shocks over one volt, and use their electrogenerative organs to either stun or kill prey and/or attackers. There are many fish that can produce a small current (“weakly electric”), but it is used for electrolocation and electrocommunication, instead.

Images:
Fishes of Zanzibar: Acanthopterygii. J. Van Voorst, 1866.
The Standard Natural History. John Sterling Kingsley, 1884.
Wild life of the world. Richard Lydekker, 1915.

One of these things is not like the other…

First row: Walrus (Odobenus rosmarus) skeleton
Second row: Hooded seal (Cystopkora cristata) skeleton
Third row: Dugong (Dugong dugon) skeleton, Brazilian sea lion (Otaria flavescens) skeleton.

*Skulls depicted are of species in the same genus as the skeleton.

Sirenia (manatees, dugongs, and sea cows) and Pinnipedia (the seals, walruses, and sea lions) are often seen as very similar, but they came from very different lineages.

While both came from land mammals (just like all sea mammals), the pinnipeds evolved from a bear-like ancestor, who returned to the sea around 28 MYA. They’re Caniformidae, or dog-like Carnivora.

The sirens evolved from the same ancestor as the hyraxes and elephants, and returned to the sea around 50 MYA. They’re only distantly related to Cetaceans and Pinnipeds.

Vergleicheende Osteologie. Edward D’alton, 1821.

weavercat:

lostbeasts:

biomedicalephemera:

“Comparison of ancestral and existing horse”

The lower figure is a model of a full-sized Eohippus, placed beneath the skull of a modern horse, to show that the skull of the modern horse is larger than the entire body of its ancestor.

Despite being one of the most commonly cited “facts” in basic paleontology (as found in many elementary school science texts), this size comparison is actually incorrect. Geologist Henry Fairfield Osborn distributed (largely correct, aside from this point) educational pamphlets citing the size of Eohippus to be comparable to a “small fox terrier” to schoolhouses, to promote the science of paleontology, around the turn of the century.
His pamphlets reached so far and wide that the “fact” still persists to this day in many textbooks. Eohippus was about twice the size of a fox terrier, which is about 2.5 times the size of a modern horse skull.
Origin and History of the Horse. Address before the New York Farmers Metropolitan Club, 1905.

i much prefer the name Eohippus to Hyracotherium

Well, I prefer Hyracotherium as it is more closely related to paleotheres than ‘Eophippus’. Also, in college text-books, the freaking fox-terrier bit is still cited. Also, those feet look.. odd. Maybe it’s just me but they don’t look quite right. I thought the fifth toes on the forelegs were up ‘higher’ on the foot.

The fifth toes weren’t higher up on the foot until Mesohippus, about 15 million years later. Hyracotherium was very wolf-like in its feet, though you can see from its leg structure that it had already begun the transition into a true prey animal, built for running long distances.
Re: those college texts: It’s hard to criticize them currently, as a LARGE fox terrier can reach up to 15 inches, which would have been the size of a small “Eohippus”. However, when the pamphlet was written by Osborn, the standard size of a fox terrier was 13” tall - a small fox terrier would have been less than 8” at its withers, and was much smaller than the horse he purports it to represent.

weavercat:

lostbeasts:

biomedicalephemera:

“Comparison of ancestral and existing horse”

The lower figure is a model of a full-sized Eohippus, placed beneath the skull of a modern horse, to show that the skull of the modern horse is larger than the entire body of its ancestor.

Despite being one of the most commonly cited “facts” in basic paleontology (as found in many elementary school science texts), this size comparison is actually incorrect. Geologist Henry Fairfield Osborn distributed (largely correct, aside from this point) educational pamphlets citing the size of Eohippus to be comparable to a “small fox terrier” to schoolhouses, to promote the science of paleontology, around the turn of the century.

His pamphlets reached so far and wide that the “fact” still persists to this day in many textbooks. Eohippus was about twice the size of a fox terrier, which is about 2.5 times the size of a modern horse skull.

Origin and History of the Horse. Address before the New York Farmers Metropolitan Club, 1905.

i much prefer the name Eohippus to Hyracotherium

Well, I prefer Hyracotherium as it is more closely related to paleotheres than ‘Eophippus’. Also, in college text-books, the freaking fox-terrier bit is still cited. Also, those feet look.. odd. Maybe it’s just me but they don’t look quite right. I thought the fifth toes on the forelegs were up ‘higher’ on the foot.

The fifth toes weren’t higher up on the foot until Mesohippus, about 15 million years later. Hyracotherium was very wolf-like in its feet, though you can see from its leg structure that it had already begun the transition into a true prey animal, built for running long distances.

Re: those college texts: It’s hard to criticize them currently, as a LARGE fox terrier can reach up to 15 inches, which would have been the size of a small “Eohippus”. However, when the pamphlet was written by Osborn, the standard size of a fox terrier was 13” tall - a small fox terrier would have been less than 8” at its withers, and was much smaller than the horse he purports it to represent.

Ulterior motives

I’ll be honest, half the reason I posted all those hoatzin photos is because as much as I love the stink-birds, every time I read an article on them that has an illustration, it’s the same friggin’ photograph every time. For some reason that started annoying me when I was reading about hoatzin relation to the ani versus other cuckoos this morning.

So…hey, if you’re writing an article that has anything to do with juvenile hoatzins, go crazy. The source material has a few more images I didn’t post. And I promise you they’re as good as that standard hoatzin chick photo-illustration that everyone uses.

The Juvenile Hoatzin (Opisthocomus hoazin)

It should first be noted that all birds are dinosaurs (order Saurischia, clade Theropoda), not just descendents of dinosaurs - modern genetic analysis strongly supports this cladistic organization. But given what we’re too often taught in schools, birds and dinosaurs are hard to reconcile in many peoples’ minds.

The juvenile hoatzin, however, makes it easy to see the reptilian traits that once dominated the early birds, and displays the unused genetic codes that lurk in the genome of modern avians. When they hatch, they’re equipped with lizard-like claws in front of their wings. Their use is described here, but in short, they use them to return to their nest and avoid predators. Their claws disappear by the time they leave the nest, having grown together into the metacarpals that support the wing structure.

Another fascinating trait of the hoatzins is their vegetarianism and their digestive tract. They have gut flora and fermentation similar to ruminants, which no other bird has. This is actually what leads to their being called “stink birds” - they exude a lot of stench with the fermentation process. The gut fermentation is so important to the hoatzin that the flight muscles attached to their keel are significantly reduced, to allow for more space for the stomach. They are weak flyers because of this. After a large meal, an adult hoatzin can spend up to two days doing almost nothing, allowing the leaves and greenery to have their nutrients released by their symbiotic gut flora.

Images:

Top: Attitudes of the juvenile hoatzin while climbing
Second row, left: Hoatzin nest with two eggs - Note proximity to water
Second row, right: Two hoatzin chicks preparing to dive, after appearance of threat from above
Third row, left: Hoatzin chick demonstrating strong swimming abilities
Third row, right: Hoatzin chick demonstrating poor locomotion on land
Bottom: Detail of hoatzin chick climbing, using neck, feet, and claws.

Tropical Wild Life in British Guinea, Vol 1. Curated by William Beebe, 1898.

Top Left: Llama - Lama glamaTop Right: Vicugna - Lama guanicoeCenter: Alpaca - Vicugna pacos (previously categorized in genus Lama)Bottom: Bactrian camel - Camelus bactrianus
The Camelids are Artiodactyla (even-toed ungulates) that first evolved in North America during the Eocene epoch (55.8 MYA - 33.9 MYA). Like horses, this group of animals evolved here for millions of years, but went extinct in North America after populations crossed the Bering land bridge. 
Unlike horses, however, the Camelids not only crossed over into Asia, but they also went south, into South America, during the Great American Exchange.
The camelids which moved south evolved into what we now know as the tribe Lamini - the llama and guanaco (genus Lama), and alpaca and vicugna (genus Vicugna). The camelids which traveled into Asia, the Middle East, and North Africa, evolved into the tribe Camelini - the Bactrian and dromedary camels (genus Camelus).
The Animal Kingdom, based on the writings of Eminent Naturalists: Vol 2. Hugh Craig, 1902.

Top Left: Llama - Lama glama
Top Right: Vicugna - Lama guanicoe
Center: Alpaca - Vicugna pacos (previously categorized in genus Lama)
Bottom: Bactrian camel - Camelus bactrianus

The Camelids are Artiodactyla (even-toed ungulates) that first evolved in North America during the Eocene epoch (55.8 MYA - 33.9 MYA). Like horses, this group of animals evolved here for millions of years, but went extinct in North America after populations crossed the Bering land bridge.

Unlike horses, however, the Camelids not only crossed over into Asia, but they also went south, into South America, during the Great American Exchange.

The camelids which moved south evolved into what we now know as the tribe Lamini - the llama and guanaco (genus Lama), and alpaca and vicugna (genus Vicugna). The camelids which traveled into Asia, the Middle East, and North Africa, evolved into the tribe Camelini - the Bactrian and dromedary camels (genus Camelus).

The Animal Kingdom, based on the writings of Eminent Naturalists: Vol 2. Hugh Craig, 1902.

sirjosephbanksfrs:

biomedicalephemera:

Apteryx owenii - The  Little Spotted Kiwi - In life and superficial lateral dissection

Though at first glance the kiwi appears to not have any wings, the lateral anatomical view with no feathers shows that external wings still exist. Of course, they are rudimentary at best, and useless for flying, but they still serve to balance the bird and are not considered vestigial. The only birds that had no wings were the giant Moas, also of New Zealand.

Transactions of the Zoological Society of London, Vol III. 1849.

Kiwis have minute wings, not considered to be vestigial because they serve the purpose of helping the animal to balance.

This is actually pretty true (that the tiny things DO have a function) in the Little Spotted Kiwi and the Brown Kiwi - you can see them being used like that in their natural habitat, which is generally rough terrain.

But I think a case could be made for them being truly vestigial in the Great Spotted kiwi. The size of the wings in the Great Spotted is smaller than even the wings of the Little Spotted, the weight is differently distributed in the two species (with a heavier hind-end in the Great), and the Great Spotted has proportionally larger leg muscles. Not to mention they also live in a flatter and less rough habitat, but I’m not sure how much that played into the differences in body structure.

That said, you’ll always have people arguing that even the most useless remnant of a limb or organ isn’t vestigial, because the body works around what it has - even if you watched the process of, say, horse leg evolution, and realized that eventually the remnants of the fibula probably won’t exist anymore, you can say that they’re not vestigial, because the muscles of the horse still partially attach to the fused parts of that bone.

kevkjahn:

biomedicalephemera:

The Pronghorn - Antilocapra americana
The pronghorn is still colloquially known as the “prong-horned antelope”, even though it’s not actually related to the true Old World antelopes, which are native to Asia and Africa. It fills a similar ecological niche, and appears very similar, due to convergent evolution.
When humans first arrived in North America, there were five species of Antilocarpa extant, but the other four have since gone extinct. The other North American Artiodactyla were much larger than the pronghorns are. In fact, the fawns of these ruminants are so small at birth (only a few lbs) that they’re not uncommonly snatched by golden eagles, in smaller harems that cannot effectively defend their offspring while eating.
Quadrupeds of North America. John James Audubon, 1854.

To add to, and perhaps detract from, this lovely illustration, I present the wonderful Texas version of “Lie in the bed you’ve made”. 
“It’s time to paint your ass white and run like a pronghorn.”

*Boing-boing-boing!*
The pronghorn is the second-fastest land animal, and can sustain high speed for much longer than the African cheetahs. When they evolved, there was a very similar big cat in North America - the American cheetah. The pronghorn and the other Antilocarpa were their primary food source. 
It’s not known for certain, but the fossil records appear to show that the other Antilocarpa went extinct before the American cheetah. The little Pronghorn was the fastest and, probably, the least appealing of the local food sources. Evolution in action!

kevkjahn:

biomedicalephemera:

The Pronghorn - Antilocapra americana

The pronghorn is still colloquially known as the “prong-horned antelope”, even though it’s not actually related to the true Old World antelopes, which are native to Asia and Africa. It fills a similar ecological niche, and appears very similar, due to convergent evolution.

When humans first arrived in North America, there were five species of Antilocarpa extant, but the other four have since gone extinct. The other North American Artiodactyla were much larger than the pronghorns are. In fact, the fawns of these ruminants are so small at birth (only a few lbs) that they’re not uncommonly snatched by golden eagles, in smaller harems that cannot effectively defend their offspring while eating.

Quadrupeds of North America. John James Audubon, 1854.

To add to, and perhaps detract from, this lovely illustration, I present the wonderful Texas version of “Lie in the bed you’ve made”. 

It’s time to paint your ass white and run like a pronghorn.”

*Boing-boing-boing!*

The pronghorn is the second-fastest land animal, and can sustain high speed for much longer than the African cheetahs. When they evolved, there was a very similar big cat in North America - the American cheetah. The pronghorn and the other Antilocarpa were their primary food source.

It’s not known for certain, but the fossil records appear to show that the other Antilocarpa went extinct before the American cheetah. The little Pronghorn was the fastest and, probably, the least appealing of the local food sources. Evolution in action!

biomedicalephemera:

“Great Beast” (Megatherium) skeleton, from George Shaw’s Zoological Lectures delivered at the Royal Institution, 1800. 
Megatherium americana was one of the few species of South American megafauna to not die out soon after the Great American Interchange at the beginning of the Pliocine era, and there’s evidence that it was encountered and hunted by early humans, especially after it expanded northwards into southern North America.
The size of a bull elephant, Megatherium were largely quadrupeds, but could use their massive tail as a tripod-like base to allow themselves to stand on their hind legs and pull down the choicest branches of leaves. Their somewhat smaller (rhino-sized) ancestor Promegatherium is believed to be a direct ancestor of both Megatherium and modern-day sloths. 

biomedicalephemera:

“Great Beast” (Megatherium) skeleton, from George Shaw’s Zoological Lectures delivered at the Royal Institution, 1800. 

Megatherium americana was one of the few species of South American megafauna to not die out soon after the Great American Interchange at the beginning of the Pliocine era, and there’s evidence that it was encountered and hunted by early humans, especially after it expanded northwards into southern North America.

The size of a bull elephant, Megatherium were largely quadrupeds, but could use their massive tail as a tripod-like base to allow themselves to stand on their hind legs and pull down the choicest branches of leaves. Their somewhat smaller (rhino-sized) ancestor Promegatherium is believed to be a direct ancestor of both Megatherium and modern-day sloths. 

Top: Canada Lynx (Lynx candensis)
Bottom: Bobcat (Lynx rufus)

Despite both being members of the Lynx genus, the bobcat and Canada lynx did are not as closely related as one might think.

The Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx) first arrived in North America approximately 2.6 million years ago, crossing over the Bering Land Bridge, and moved far to the south, eventually settling in the Southern half of North America and evolving into what we know as the modern bobcat by the time of the earliest human settlers to the land.

During the last Ice Age (22,000 years ago), the Eurasian lynx once again crossed into North America, along with the Homo sapiens who would eventually populate the continent. This second population evolved into the Canada lynx, which is much more closely related to their progenitors than the bobcats are.

The fur patterns of the bobcat vary drastically from region to region. Some southern bobcats are spotted almost identically to the ocelot, while others in the north are much closer to the faded-spot and grey-white coat of the Canada lynx. All bobcats are generally smaller than the lynx, and have tails about twice the length of other lynx species. They’re also generally more adaptable, as they will act as opportunistic predators when the need arises.

The Canada lynx can be discerned from the bobcat by, in addition to its size and tail, its distinctive striped ruffed collar, and tufts of fur above the ears.

Wild Animals of the World. Edward W. Nelson for the National Geographic Society, 1918.

Ways to Die: Snake Venom

The vast majority of snakes that one encounters in the wild (unless you live in Australia or India) are either non-venomous to humans or want nothing to do with you.

However, should you stumble upon a rattlesnake nest or coral snake hole while texting in the middle of nowhere, there will probably be a combination of different enzymes and polypeptides pumped into your body, via the modified parotid salivary glands (right below the ear in humans) that snakes have evolved over the ages, to disable their prey. Of course, you’re not prey, but you stepped on a snake while texting. It has every reason to envenomate you.

While all snakes have multiple active enzymes in their venom, all snakes dangerous to humans have either neurotoxins or cytotoxins as a significant component in their venom. For the most part, elapids (such as the cobras and mambas) create neurotoxins, while the viperids (such as vipers, adders, and rattlesnakes) create cytotoxins.

Neurotoxins

  • Dendrotoxins: Inhibit neurotransmission by blocking the exchange of positive and negative ions across the pre-synaptic neuronal membrane, causing paralysis. Found in some rattlesnakes (such as the Mojave) and mambas.
  • Fasciculins: Destroys acetylcholinesterase (AChE) in synaptic clefts of nerves. Without AChE, acetylcholine (ACh) is not broken down, and remains bound to the postsynaptic vesicles of the nerve, leading to constant contraction of the related muscles. This is called tetany or tetanic paralysis. Found only in mambas.
  • α-neurotoxins: Very large group of toxins that mimic ACh and bind to post-synaptic vesicles, leading to numbness and paralysis. Found in cobras, kraits, and sea snakes. 

Cytotoxins

  • Cardiotoxins: Target muscle cells and cause depolarization. If enough of these components reach the heart, the depolarization can cause irregular heartbeat or spontaneous stopping of the heart. Can cause fasciculations in skeletal muscles. Found in the Naja genus, and in King Cobras. Minor but important component of mamba venom.
  • Phospholipases: Proteins that target the phospholipid bilayer of cells, causing cellular rupture. Can cause extreme blistering at site of bite. Relatively uncommon, found in the Japanese Habu.
  • Hemotoxins: Burst red blood cells (hemolysis), causing thin blood, internal bleeding, and blood clots due to the massive clotting response. Found to some degree in almost all vipers, as well as some cobras.

Images:
Top: Bungaris fasciatus - Banded Krait. An elapid, and the largest of the kraits. Has neurotoxic venom. [source]
Center Right: Hydrophis robusta [now Hydrophis spiralis] - Yellow Sea-Snake. The longest sea snake, at 3 m (9.8 ft). A member of the Hydrophiinae, separate from other elapids. Though they have some of the most toxic venom in the world, bites are extremely uncommon and often unnoticed. [source]
Center Left: Vipera russellii - Russell’s Viper. A particularly aggressive viperid. Necrosis and amputation following envenomation not uncommon, due to hemolysis and local cell damage. [source]
Bottom: Vipera caudisona [now Crotalus horridus] - Timber Rattlesnake. A venomous viperid endemic to the United States. Primarily hemotoxic venom, very low fatality rate, but very painful bites. [source]

biomedicalephemera:

Latimeria chalumnae - Coelacanth
The coelacanth was assumed extinct until 1938, since fossils of it had been found long before, yet hadn’t ever been caught by anyone who recognized it (it was known as the “gombessa” by the Comoro Islands fishermen, and was considered a worthless fish to be disgarded, as it tasted awful). It’s thought to have evolved over 400 million years ago, and were originally assumed to have gone extinct in the Late Cretaceous period.
The Search Beneath the Sea: The Story of the Coelacanth. J.L.B. Smith, 1956.

biomedicalephemera:

Latimeria chalumnae - Coelacanth

The coelacanth was assumed extinct until 1938, since fossils of it had been found long before, yet hadn’t ever been caught by anyone who recognized it (it was known as the “gombessa” by the Comoro Islands fishermen, and was considered a worthless fish to be disgarded, as it tasted awful). It’s thought to have evolved over 400 million years ago, and were originally assumed to have gone extinct in the Late Cretaceous period.

The Search Beneath the Sea: The Story of the Coelacanth. J.L.B. Smith, 1956.

Giant Golden Mole - Chrysochloris trevelyani [now Chrysospalax trevelyani]
If there were ever a mammal worthy of being given the common name of “Blorp”, this would be it. But no, they get to be called the “giant golden mole”, despite not being all that giant, or all that golden. I’m still calling them Blorps.
These pudgers are ancient, mostly-desert-dwelling Gondwanan creatures which are remarkably well adapted to climates with significant thermal shifts. During times of extreme heat or cold, their bodies can go into a state of torpor, almost stalling their basal metabolism rate, and completely turning off their internal thermoregulation until the temperature returns to a more amicable range.
The family of golden moles, Chrysochloridae, is not related to the “true moles” (Talpidae), but get their common name from their similar appearance, which developed through convergent evolution. Most scientists agree that the golden moles are more closely related to hedgehogs and shrews than to true moles, though some theories group them with the tenrecs. Until full genetic profiles are established for the Insectivoridae, we probably won’t have a definitive answer.
Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London. 1875.

Giant Golden Mole - Chrysochloris trevelyani [now Chrysospalax trevelyani]

If there were ever a mammal worthy of being given the common name of “Blorp”, this would be it. But no, they get to be called the “giant golden mole”, despite not being all that giant, or all that golden. I’m still calling them Blorps.

These pudgers are ancient, mostly-desert-dwelling Gondwanan creatures which are remarkably well adapted to climates with significant thermal shifts. During times of extreme heat or cold, their bodies can go into a state of torpor, almost stalling their basal metabolism rate, and completely turning off their internal thermoregulation until the temperature returns to a more amicable range.

The family of golden moles, Chrysochloridae, is not related to the “true moles” (Talpidae), but get their common name from their similar appearance, which developed through convergent evolution. Most scientists agree that the golden moles are more closely related to hedgehogs and shrews than to true moles, though some theories group them with the tenrecs. Until full genetic profiles are established for the Insectivoridae, we probably won’t have a definitive answer.

Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London. 1875.

Vesalius and modern anatomy

biomedicalephemera:

Vesalius the person:

Andreas Vesalius was born in Brussels in 1514, on the morning of December 31. His given name was André Wesele (Witing) Crabbe, and Andreas Vesalius was a name taken on after deciding to pursue medicine, at age 17. He came from a line of physicians and apothecaries, and his great-great-grandfather was a physician who had amassed a large collection of medical texts, in which Vesalius sated his early interest in medicine. After studying medicine at the University of Paris for his Bachelor’s, he received his title of doctor in medicine cum ultima diminutione from the University of Padua, where only days later he was appointed Professor of Surgery and Anatomy.

Read More